Battling wilding pines was one of two subjects all political parties were strongly agreed on at the recent Federated Farmers Rural Debate

Date: 7th October 2026

Debate Participants: Todd McClay (National), Jo Luxton (Labour), Mark Patterson (NZ First), Andrew Hoggard (ACT), Steve Abel (Green)

The following article is reprinted from an article by Rob Stock in The Post on 3rd October 2026.

One dairy farmer couldn’t hold back on her belief that the Greens had “con­spired” with Dutch cli­mate act­iv­ists to com­plain to the European Union that New Zea­l­and was back­track­ing on its cli­mate oblig­a­tions under its free trade agree­ment.

Her fury was aimed at MP Steve Abel, rep­res­ent­ing the Green Party, dur­ing the Fed­er­ated Farm­ers/Beef + Lamb/DairyNZ rural debate at Mys­tery Creek show­grounds on Wed­nes­day.

National, which hit out at the Greens for the move last week, has provided no evid­ence to sup­port its argu­ment that a “con­spir­acy” had taken place.

Abel said the party hadn’t, but admit­ted: “We flagged for some time that there was a risk of a com­plaint because New Zea­l­and has failed in its oblig­a­tions in the EU agree­ment … We’ve been talk­ing about it for about three years,” he said. “That’s our job – to draw atten­tion to risks to our eco­nomy.”

Trade Min­is­ter Todd McClay, rep­res­ent­ing National, reit­er­ated his charge that Greens leader Chlöe Swar­brick had teamed up with a Bel­gian MP in April to ask for an EU invest­ig­a­tion.

The rural debate didn’t lack for moments illu­min­at­ing the polit­ical divide that threatens policy upheaval for the rural sec­tor should the gov­ern­ment change in Novem­ber’s elec­tion.

Clash over cheese prices

The farm­ing sec­tor has been driv­ing the eco­nomy, and farm­ers are in a self-con­grat­u­lat­ory mood about it. They feel that dairy, beef and sheep farm­ers are provid­ing nutri­tious food the world needs.

Abel was incred­u­lous about that, ask­ing when it had ever been the dairy sec­tor’s pri­or­ity.

“Fonterra doesn’t even care about feed­ing New Zeal­anders,” he said, point­ing to cheese prices that have made it unaf­ford­able for many, prompt­ing cries of protest from the audi­ence, which was largely drawn from local farm­ers.

It’s been a tough time for many New Zeal­anders as high food prices have con­trib­uted to a cost-of-liv­ing crisis that is the key issue in the elec­tion cam­paign.

But high food prices have enriched farm­ers, and the ranks of late-model utes parked out­side the Galla­gher Build­ing at Mys­tery Creek for the debate were very dif­fer­ent from the vehicle mix seen in urban Pak’nSaves.

Gross emis­sions versus intens­ity

There’s a philo­soph­ical clash at the heart of the rural cli­mate debate. On the left is the demand for gross emis­sions from the sec­tor to come down, brought about through tech­no­logy and a reduc­tion in stock levels. On the right is the belief that the emis­sions intens­ity (emis­sions per product pro­duced) in New Zea­l­and is lower than that of over­seas farm­ers, so it would be mad, and planet-dam­aging, to reduce pro­duc­tion here only for it to be replaced by pro­duc­tion over­seas.

“We’ve got the most effi­cient food pro­du­cers in the world,” said Andrew Hog­gard, former Fed­er­ated Farm­ers pres­id­ent and Min­is­ter for Bio­se­c­ur­ity and Food Safety and Asso­ciate Min­is­ter of Agri­cul­ture, who rep­res­en­ted ACT in the debate.

Abel said New Zea­l­and’s gross emis­sions had to come down, and the Greens believed that this could be done while increas­ing agri­cul­tural income through a gov­ern­ment-man­aged over­haul of the sec­tor.

Paris exit fantas­ies

If the responses from the debate crowd were rep­res­ent­at­ive of the farm­ing com­munity, a size­able minor­ity fan­tas­ise about New Zea­l­and pulling out of the Paris Agree­ment.

McClay sought to lay that idea to rest. “You do not have to believe in cli­mate change. You just have to believe that farm­ers over­seas don’t want New Zea­l­and products on that shelf, and … will say, ‘Look at New Zea­l­and, they shouldn’t be allowed to sell here’, and it won’t be on the shelf,” he said.

But National’s coali­tion part­ners didn’t buy that. NZ First’s Mark Pat­ter­son said New Zea­l­and should pull out of the Paris Agree­ment. Hog­gard said ACT would like to see the agree­ment rene­go­ti­ated to be fairer on meth­ane emis­sions.

Abel said: “We are dream­ing if we think that the rest of the world doesn’t care about us play­ing our part in the chal­lenge of cli­mate change.”

Action on swim­mable rivers

But farm­ers are wor­ried about what a leftwing coali­tion would do about water qual­ity and swim­mable rivers.

Labour would, if elec­ted, start a select com­mit­tee pro­cess to set goals and rules, with a “start­ing point” being what debate mod­er­ator Heather Du Plessis-Allan called Labour’s last set of “sweep­ing new fresh­wa­ter rules that farm­ers hated”.

It’s been a farm­ers’ gov­ern­ment

Fed­er­ated Farm­ers put out an elec­tion mani­festo in 2023, and got the vast major­ity of what it wanted, fail­ing only on lib­er­al­ising the use of genet­ic­ally mod­i­fied organ­isms.

Pat­ter­son said: “We’ve been the most pro-farmer, pro-rural gov­ern­ment we’ve had in this coun­try for a very long time.”

NZ First killed the GM bill, Pat­ter­son admit­ted with a smile, but there was no press­ing hurry, because there were as yet no game-chan­ging GM tech­no­lo­gies New Zea­l­and needed.

But it got car­bon forestry wrong

However, there’s con­tinu­ing rural alarm about busi­nesses plant­ing exotic pine trees on farm­land. The Gov­ern­ment has moved to limit it, but farm­ers don’t think it went far enough. Labour has prom­ised an urgent review if it wins power.

India free trade deal ‘the worst’

Pat­ter­son called the India free trade deal “a polit­ical slo­gan mas­quer­ad­ing as a free trade deal”. He said: “There’s no dairy, there’s no beef.”

That brought an inter­jec­tion from McClay, who nego­ti­ated the deal, that Hindus didn’t eat beef.

Pat­ter­son objec­ted to the India FTA com­mit­ment to facil­it­ate $35 bil­lion of New Zea­l­and invest­ment in India, which National says only binds the coun­try to mak­ing its “best endeav­ours” to achieve it.

Abel called it “prob­ably the worst trade deal that we’ve ever nego­ti­ated”.

Where every­one agrees

On two sub­jects, agree­ment between parties was strong – bat­tling wild­ing pines and get­ting solar energy on to farms


Posted in: News